IBT hits the Rose McGowan-Oprah series with the headline that says 'actress' is much poorer than celebrity host she called 'fake'
Actress and activist Rose McGowan, who recently took to Twitter to accuse Oprah Winfrey of “supporting a sick power structure”, has been met with some backlash, but an outburst stunned many by opposing the two riches.
“Rose McGowan vs. Oprah Net Worth: The Actor’s Wealth Only 0.12% of the Host’s Wealth," reads the headline of a story by the International Business Times published on Wednesday.
McGowan shared the headline Thursday, accusing the publication of trying to protect Winfrey and negate McGowan’s opinion by adding tacit value to the income discrepancy.
“According to @IBTimes, nothing a non-billionaire says is valid. Lizards support lizards, ” McGowan tweeted.
McGowan also posted a video on social media with the headline. The ‘Scream’ actress blew up the publication as “Paid pills and monsters."
IBT’s article comparing the net worth of billionaire media mogul Winfrey to actress and author McGowan contains mostly generic information. But many users were quick to point out in McGowan’s defense that the facts presented bulb to paint the actor in a relatively negative light.
After briefly mentioning her work in front of the camera and the praise she has received for her work on behalf of substance abuse victims, IBT makes sure to mention that McGowan “Was allegedly paid $ 130,000” as a solution in a case against the disgraced producer Harvey Weinstein, who was sentenced to 23 years in prison this year and faces several charges after several cutting reports detailed allegations of years of sexual harassment and abuse, many of them from actresses including McGowan.
In IBT’s article, they move from McGowan’s Weinstein trial to Winfrey by saying: “On the other hand, Winfrey … has built an empire and reportedly earns about $ 300 million a year."
McGowan said in his video response that the settlement was a way to avoid signing a confidentiality agreement with the former producer. This, she added, led to Weinstein “Terrorizing” her for years.
“Thanks for adding it," she told the IBT.
McGowan has garnered attention this week for his repeated criticism of Winfrey, an outspoken liberal and alleged #MeToo supporter who has had controversial relationships with not only Weinstein but also music producer Russell Simmons, who has also faced numerous allegations of sexual misconduct. offense.
I’m glad more people are watching the ugly truth about @Oprah. I wish she was real, but she’s not. From being friends with Weinstein to abandoning and destroying Russell Simmons' victims, she’s about supporting a sick power structure for personal gain, she’s as false as they come. #lizardpic.twitter.com/RCuXNpWCU0
- Rose 🌊McGowan (@rosemcgowan) August 29, 2021
Many social media users were taken straight surprised by focusing on wealth as a way of covering McGowan’s critique of Winfrey, as well as the portrayal of McGowan.
“I’m not really an ‘eat the rich’ kind of person, but it’s an excellent case for practice," a Twitter user commented.
They’re trying to pretend that Weinstein went to jail for jaywalking or something smh
- Rabbit Foo Foo @ (@Rabbit_FooFoo) September 2, 2021
If you Like This Story, Share It With A Friend!